Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jaimee Fourlis vs Kateryna Baindl Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fourlis vs Baindl analysis and find out who is favored!
Jaimee Fourlis vs Kateryna Baindl Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fourlis 0 - 0 Baindl
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fourlis has won 39.74% of points on his second serve, while Baindl has won 45.59%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fourlis, in recent form, has won 53.8% of his opponent's second serve points, while Baindl has won 60.42%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.11% and 44.39% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fourlis has saved 48.37% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Baindl has saved 44.12% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fourlis has won 48.65% of matches played (W/L 18/ 19), with Baindl winning 51.52% (W/L 17/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fourlis has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 17/ 10), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 86/ 76). Baindl has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 132/ 85), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 18/ 21).
- Player level: In the last year, Fourlis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48% of matches (W/L 12/ 13), where as Baindl has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 50% of matches (W/L 8/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fourlis has played against opponents with an average rank of 220.14 while Baindl has played against players with an average rank of 257.73.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fourlis has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Baindl has won 31% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fourlis has converted 52.5% of breakpoint opportunities, and Baindl has converted 41.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fourlis 0 - 0 Baindl
305
Rank
147
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
171
Rank
62
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
57% (204-155)
Career Total W/L
58% (385-281)
41% (7-10)
YTD W/L
67% (2-1)
$275,258
Career Prize Money
$1,265,236
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jaimee Fourlis | Kateryna Baindl |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 41% (7/10) | 67% (2/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 41% (17/24) | 63% (5/3) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (184/201) | 52% (40/37) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) | 67% (2/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.22 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 42 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 71 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 2:20:40 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 233.41 | 558.33 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (795/1226) | 76% (218/286) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (452/795) | 51% (112/218) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (179/431) | 46% (31/68) |
| BPs Won% Total | 54% (78/145) | 42% (20/48) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (593/1294) | 50% (141/283) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 47% (7/8) | 67% (2/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (7/17) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 100% (1/1) |
Jaimee Fourlis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Leolia Jeanjean
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
64%
(
57 of
89)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dominika Salkova
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
5
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Despina Papamichail
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
93)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sonja Zhiyenbayeva
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve %
64%
(
70 of
110)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
51%
(
49 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
57 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve %
50%
(
14 of
28)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
39
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Sara Lanca
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Deborah Chiesa
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
76%
(
87 of
114)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
43%
(
25 of
58)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
50%
(
12 of
24)
Break Points Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
59%
(
49 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
68 of
114)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Panna Udvardy
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Yana Morderger
61%
(
63 of
104)
1st Serve %
58%
(
69 of
119)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
8
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
32%
(
13 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
52 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
61 of
119)
113
Total Points Won
110
|
5-7 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Kateryna Baindl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Dominika Salkova
Player
Kateryna Baindl
65%
(
64 of
99)
1st Serve %
83%
(
79 of
95)
-
Aces
-
10
Double Faults
3
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
48%
(
48 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
51 of
95)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kateryna Baindl
Player
Andreea Mitu
75%
(
89 of
118)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
10
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
57 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
107
Total Points Won
106
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kateryna Baindl
Player
Marina Melnikova
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
74%
(
66 of
89)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
46%
(
23 of
50)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
48%
(
35 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
89)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Kateryna Baindl
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
80%
(
83 of
104)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
38%
(
8 of
21)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
51%
(
37 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
58 of
104)
94
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Kateryna Baindl
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kateryna Baindl
Player
Yanina Wickmayer
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
39 of
71)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kateryna Baindl
Player
Rebeka Masarova
85%
(
50 of
59)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucia Bronzetti
Player
Kateryna Baindl
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kateryna Baindl
Player
Yue Yuan
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Kateryna Baindl
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
11
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Fourlis Vs Baindl Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
